Log in

Bibliographic Instruction
some assorted thoughts on a favorite psychic... 
7th-Feb-2007 09:13 pm
One of the things that makes my life a little more worth living (if we had to quantify it, it wouldn't be too much, of course) is the fact that at 10 AM on Wed. mornings, the Montel Williams show comes on. Well, it comes on every weekday at 10, really. But Wednesdays are special because it's Sylvia Brown's day to come on! Woo-hoo! We get to explore some aspects of the New Age together, figure out "who really killed so-and-so's brother/friend/great-aunt twice removed," etc.

Let's get some things clear, first of all, about where I come from around the whole issue of psychics, anyway. I believe that there are events that appear extraordinary to us, probably because we haven't the science to explain them just yet. I also believe that there is great potential within humanity, within the earth, with every molecule and beyond. The state we're in now, we have yet to reach our potential, to discover what it means to be "truly human." So I believe in vast possibilities and in many unexplainable things. That's my theory.

Then, we hit reality. Are the psychics out there capable of doing what some of us would like them to do - give us answers to the questions that have caused us so much grief and pain and heartache? Can they give us factual answers to solve cases and such? I don't know; I haven't done any scientific studies, nor have I read any that exist.

I watch Sylvia on Montel with great interest, because what she does is so fascinating to me. It's not only that she's a psychic, she's also called to act as counselor, physician, confessor and pastor, to a certain degree. She answers the outward questions that people bring to her, but also works to answer their unasked, subtexted questions. "Do the dead that I grieve for so much still hear me? Am I a good person? Does God love me? Has my (dead) sister forgiven me? Am I known by the universe? Am I loved?" In seeking answers to the outward questions that one would ask a psychic, much of what one really seeks is the kind of knowledge that can only come from within and is generally hard-won.

It seems as if she takes her many roles seriously. As someone who does psychic readings (some would say cold readings), she is well-versed in talking to a great variety of people, in some sense prepared for any question that could come her way. (Of course, most of the questions that people ask her fall into about 3 or so categories.) The number of books she has written is a profound one, and as of late she has come out with a couple that go right into the territory of Christian theology.

I have read The Mystical Life of Jesus: An Uncommon Perspective on the Life of Christ; it is of course a subject that I am very interested in. As I was reading through the book, I read it as a theologian might - with an eye toward critical scholarship. That might be too much to expect of a book written by a popular psychic, but ya never know, right? I was fascinated by it, of course. It was interesting to line up what she was saying with what I have learned in my own studies. I didn't recognize most of the theologians that she consulted in preparation of the book; I thought it could've benefitted with a little JD Crossan, or some other radical theologian. She makes some rather outlandish claims. As someone who has studied Christian history and theology, I am well aware that there are plenty of good reasons for making outlandish claims, but is it responsible to make those claims based upon what one's guide tells one, rather than perhaps spending more time with the history available?

Her very newest book, Father God: Co-creator to Mother God was talked about on this morning's show. Of course, the title from the very beginning irked me. On the show, there was no mention of Mother God, and so I was appropriately pissed off. I'm slightly less irked, now that I see there is a "Mother God" in the title (and hopefully in the book) - what would someone who describes herself as "Gnostic Christian" be doing writing a book solely about Father God? ;-) I haven't read the book, but might find it interesting skimming material some bored night at Borders.

Anyone who is such a huge public figure like she is, I believe, has some kind of responsibility to uphold. Sure, people need to be able to have the ability to discern for themselves between right and wrong, good and bad, but in a culture that doesn't do a great job of teaching that, where do we learn the lessons, and who do we turn to as figure to look up to and teach us? I think that since Sylvia takes on the above-mentioned roles, it would do her well to receive real training for those roles. And if she's gonna try and be a biblical scholar, I think seminary, or some classes at seminary, would help.
8th-Feb-2007 05:11 am (UTC)
This is one subject where I wholeheartedly agree with the skeptics - by all appearances, Sylvia Brown is a fraud. She has made some notable public errors - making strong claims that turn out to be wrong(dead children later show up just fine, etc.) and outside evaluations suggest a combination of the old magician's trick of Cold Reading and Common Sense.

I have experienced and witnessed enough things to believe that there are perceptions and abilities of the human mind that are poorly understood but I don't think that those capabilities are the sort that can be turned on every Wednesday from 2-3PM.
8th-Feb-2007 09:49 am (UTC) - great topic...
WOW- that seemed up my feelings!

8th-Feb-2007 09:52 am (UTC) - Re: great topic...
Argh… it’s 3:50 am

Ignore obvious error in grammer

im sending myself to bed now
8th-Feb-2007 06:11 am (UTC)
So you know, I still enjoy your writing. :-D
8th-Feb-2007 01:43 pm (UTC)

Recently somebody posted a meme in which the question "If you could have dinner with any celebrity, who would it be?" was asked. I chose Sylvia Browne! I think she's a fascinating person - insightful and a good conversationalist, and a bit salty. :) Of course I'd like to know who really killed JFK...but she also seems like a neat person just to chit chat with. I also wouldn't mind sitting next to her on an airplane. Ha, because if she got on the plane, it's for sure not going to crash!
23rd-Feb-2007 11:00 pm (UTC)
Hi there,

I saw your post on fatshionista about fathletes amd thought it was awesome. I also came to visit here, and I loved what you wrote about Dorothy Day. I'm sort of a ambivalent maybe-returning, maybe-ex Christian, I think I'd like to be a regular reader over here. But if that feels weird and stalkery, I won't add your journal to my list. I usually ask for permission--so do you mind if I add you? Of course reciprocation is not necessary.
23rd-Feb-2007 11:46 pm (UTC)
Hi! Thanks! Sure thing. And I'm adding you back, just so ya know.
24th-Feb-2007 01:31 am (UTC)
30th-Mar-2007 04:47 pm (UTC)
Hi there, I couldn't find an email address for you, so I thought I'd post this here.


I feel weirded out. I didn't join a *dieting* community, and if that's what's going to go on in fathletes it's probably not the community for me. I am SO not into talking about counting calories. If it's going to be allowable in the community, might I suggest considering making food/diet related posts put behind cuts? I've NO desire to read them.

OK. Just let me know, thanks.
This page was loaded Feb 25th 2017, 11:03 pm GMT.